An aerospace parts traceability system has to answer one question under audit: prove what this part is made of, who touched it, and how much life it has left. We build that record - serialised genealogy, as-built and as-maintained configuration, heat lot and certificate linkage, and life-limited part tracking engineered to your AS9100 quality system.
Every serialised part linked to its material heat lot, operations, inspections, tooling and released documentation.
Cycles, hours and calendar life tracked per rotable, with remaining life visible before installation.
AS9100, DGCA and CEMILAC evidence packs assembled from live records rather than rebuilt for each audit.
Genealogy, configuration, certification and audit evidence managed through one controlled system.
Genealogy and configuration, life-limited part tracking, material certification linkage, and audit evidence with controlled access - engineered as one system for your quality head, MRO operations head and programme manager.
Configuration control fails when as-built drifts from as-designed and nobody notices until delivery. We capture every operation, inspection and part fitted against the serial, so configuration stays defensible.
A life-limited part is airworthy only while its remaining cycles are provable. We track flight cycles, operating hours and calendar life per serial, and block fitment when remaining life falls short.
Every aerospace investigation eventually reaches the raw material. We link mill certificates, heat and melt lot numbers and special process certifications to each part, so provenance is proven rather than asserted.
Evidence retrieval decides how an AS9100 or DGCA audit goes. We build first article inspection records, audit packs and export-controlled access rules into the system, not onto a shared drive.
Marking, capture and data technologies are selected against aerospace constraints, where a mark must not affect fatigue life and data may not leave the country without authorisation.
Laser and dot-peen marking applied to approved depths and locations so identification survives the service life without compromising the component.
Applications:
Tag-based tracking for tooling, jigs, ground support equipment and foreign object debris control in restricted shop-floor areas.
Applications:
An on-premise or sovereign-cloud data layer with access segregation, so ITAR-sensitive and defence programme data stays within permitted boundaries.
Applications:
Integration with the engineering and maintenance systems you already run, so traceability records reference one controlled part revision.
Applications:
Representative outcomes from aerospace and defence traceability deployments. Figures are indicative ranges and must be confirmed against your own baseline before publication.
Machining and assembly suppliers producing serialised parts against customer drawings and AS9100 obligations.
Approved maintenance organisations tracking life-limited parts and as-maintained configuration across shop visits.
Suppliers working to CEMILAC and programme-specific requirements under strict data handling constraints.
The measures a quality head, an MRO operations head and a programme manager agree before the pilot, then use to judge whether the deployment succeeded.
Share of delivered serials holding a complete operation, inspection and material record.
How we get there: Enforced by routing rules that stop a part progressing with a missing record.
Time to produce the full evidence pack for a single serial requested during an audit.
How we get there: Records are indexed against the serial rather than filed by work order in separate archives.
Agreement between recorded remaining life and the physical part records on audit sampling.
How we get there: Cycles and hours accumulate automatically from work order and utilisation data.
Effort to assemble a first article inspection package for a new part number or revision.
How we get there: Measurement, certificate and drawing references are pulled from records already captured.
A controlled sequence suited to a regulated environment where changes need documented approval.
We review your AS9100 procedures, part numbering, traveller structure and programme obligations, and identify where records currently break between systems.
Data model, marking approach, access and export control rules and integration points are approved through your own change control process.
One part family or shop runs live against agreed acceptance criteria, so genealogy completeness and audit retrieval are proven before wider adoption.
Remaining part families and shops are brought on, validation and audit documentation is prepared, and the system moves into a defined support arrangement.
Why aerospace suppliers and MROs choose an engineered traceability system over a generic manufacturing module.
Electronic signatures, change control, access logging and retention rules are designed in from the first release, because retrofitting them after an audit observation costs far more.
Access segregation by role, programme and nationality, plus on-premise or air-gapped deployment options, are treated as design requirements rather than optional configuration.
Laser and dot-peen markers, DPM readers, RFID tool control hardware and installation are supplied and integrated by the team that builds the software.
ERP, PLM and MRO systems already in place are integrated rather than replaced, so one controlled part revision stays the reference across every record.
Book a requirement discussion with our engineering team. We will review your quality system, part families and programme constraints, then return with a scoped approach, a marking and hardware outline, and an indicative timeline to a pilot.
It is a system that records the complete identity and history of every serialised aerospace component. Each part carries a permanent mark, usually a 2D DataMatrix code, and the system links that serial to its raw material heat lot and mill certificate, every manufacturing operation and inspection, the special processes applied, the assemblies it was fitted into, and the cycles and hours accumulated in service. That record supports as-built and as-maintained configuration control, airworthiness evidence and AS9100 audit response.
No. We are a custom solution development and systems integration company. The data model, marking approach, access controls and integrations are engineered to your AS9100 procedures, part numbering and programme constraints after a requirement study.
Yes. Laser and dot-peen markers, DPM vision readers, handheld scanners, RFID tool control hardware and label printers are scoped, supplied, installed and integrated, including trials confirming that mark depth and placement do not affect the component.
Each serialised rotable accumulates flight cycles, operating hours and calendar life from work order and utilisation data. The system holds the applicable life limit, calculates remaining life continuously, and blocks issue or fitment where remaining life will not cover the planned maintenance interval.
Mill certificates, heat and melt lot numbers, and special process certifications for heat treatment, non-destructive testing and plating are captured at goods-inward and linked to every part serial made from that material. Supplier and sub-tier source verification is recorded at the same point.
Yes. First article inspection records are held against part number and revision, and audit packs for AS9100, DGCA or CEMILAC assessments are generated from live records. Because certificates and drawing references are already captured, packages are assembled rather than reconstructed.
Yes. We integrate with SAP, Oracle and other ERP systems for work orders and inventory, with PLM for controlled part revisions and drawings, and with maintenance systems used by MRO organisations. Otherwise the interface is built as part of the project.
Access is segregated by role, programme and where required nationality, with every access event logged. Deployment can be fully on-premise, in a sovereign cloud region, or air-gapped for defence programmes, so controlled technical data stays inside permitted boundaries.
A pilot on one part family or shop is typically live within ten to sixteen weeks of requirement sign-off, depending on marking trials, integration complexity and the approval cycle your own change control process requires.
The system moves into an agreed support arrangement covering defined response times by severity, preventive maintenance of marking and reading hardware, integration changes when an ERP or MRO system is upgraded, and support during audits.