Farm-to-warehouse traceability built for your crop, aggregator and export flow. Farmer, plot and lot data ready for APEDA, EUDR and buyer audits.
Grower records with plot polygons, survey numbers, crop, sowing date and current certification status.
Bag, lot and stack identity maintained from mandi purchase through cleaning, grading and packing.
Shipment-wise evidence assembled for APEDA, EUDR and buyer audits without a week of file collection.
Four modules covering grower and plot registration, procurement capture, warehouse and processing lot control, and the export documentation that overseas buyers and regulators now demand.
Traceability that stops at the aggregator is no longer sufficient. We register growers and their plots with geo-coordinates, then hold certification and crop records against those plots for the whole season.
Most Indian volume still moves through mandis, commission agents and FPOs. We capture purchase at that point with enough identity to keep the farm link alive through cleaning, grading and despatch.
Cleaning, grading, blending and repacking are where farm identity is usually lost. We model each as a lot transformation so the export lot still resolves to its contributing procurement lots and plots.
The export head spends more time assembling evidence than shipping. We link lab results to lots and generate the shipment audit pack straight from the system rather than from scattered email folders.
Field data collection in agriculture happens with poor connectivity and low-cost devices, so the technology mix is chosen for those constraints, not for a demonstration.
Plot polygons captured by walking the boundary or by satellite-assisted digitisation, stored with area computation and coordinates in the format buyers request.
Android applications for field officers and FPO staff that work offline in the village and synchronise later, with local language interfaces.
Lot identity carried physically on bags, stack cards and pallets so warehouse movements are scanned rather than written into a register.
The layer connecting procurement, warehouse and lab data to your ERP and to the documentation buyers and regulators expect at shipment.
Representative outcomes from agri commodity deployments with Indian exporters and aggregators. All figures are indicative ranges and must be confirmed against your own baseline before publication.
Exporters procuring through mandis and millers while meeting residue limits set by destination markets.
Processors cleaning, grading and blending multiple procurement lots into export-grade packs for overseas buyers.
Producer organisations aggregating from smallholder members under certification or buyer-funded traceability programmes.
The measures an export head and a quality head agree with us before the pilot, then use to judge whether the system earned its place.
Share of procured volume linked to a registered farmer and a mapped plot.
Target: >90% of contracted volume
How we get there: Field app onboarding at procurement rather than retrospective data collection.
Share of registered plots with usable polygon coordinates suitable for EUDR and buyer evidence.
Target: >95% of active plots
How we get there: Boundary walking with GPS-enabled field devices and automatic area validation.
Time to assemble a complete shipment evidence pack covering plots, procurement, processing and lab results.
Target: Same working day
How we get there: Generated from linked records instead of collected from separate files.
Time to resolve an export lot back to its contributing procurement lots and farmer plots.
Target: Under 60 minutes
How we get there: Cleaning, grading and blending are recorded as explicit lot transformations.
We prove the model on one crop and one procurement cluster before scaling across the season.
We map your crop calendar, procurement channels, aggregator structure, warehouse network and the specific buyer and regulatory evidence you must produce each season.
Farmer and plot model, lot identity scheme, transformation rules, lab data linkage and export documentation formats are documented and signed off before build.
One crop and one procurement cluster run through a full cycle from registration to despatch, tested against agreed acceptance criteria including a buyer-style audit.
Remaining crops, clusters and warehouses are onboarded, field officers and FPO staff are trained, and the system moves into an agreed AMC with seasonal support cover.
Why Indian agri exporters build a traceability system rather than licensing a generic farm management application.
Mandi purchase, agent aggregation and blending are recorded as they actually happen, so the traceability claim you make to a buyer survives an audit question.
EUDR geolocation files, APEDA documentation data and buyer scheme templates are generated in the format each recipient asks for, not as a generic export.
Registration and procurement capture work without connectivity, because a procurement window at a village collection point does not pause for a network signal.
Field applications, warehouse scanning hardware, integration and support are delivered by the same engineering team under one accountable contract with defined response times.
An agriculture traceability system in India links every export or processed agri lot back to the farmers, plots and procurement events behind it. It registers growers with land records and GPS plot boundaries, captures purchases at the mandi, FPO or farm gate with weight and quality data, maintains lot identity through cleaning, grading and blending, links pesticide residue results to those lots, and produces the evidence APEDA processes, EU Deforestation Regulation submissions and buyer audits require.
It is built for you. We are a custom solution development and systems integration company. The engagement begins with a requirement study of your crops, procurement channels and buyer obligations, and the system is engineered to that.
Field officers walk the plot boundary with a GPS-enabled Android device, or the polygon is digitised over satellite imagery and verified against land records. Coordinates, area and capture date are stored and exported in the required format.
Yes, and this is usually the hardest part of the design. We capture purchase at the mandi or agent level with weighment, moisture and quality deductions, and map contributing farmers where the relationship allows, so the chain is recorded accurately.
Blending is recorded as an explicit lot transformation with each input lot and its consumed quantity. The output lot therefore carries a proportional composition back to its contributing lots and plots, which is what a buyer auditor tests.
Yes. Rugged Android devices, GPS units, barcode and QR printers, handheld scanners and weighbridge or moisture meter interfaces are scoped, supplied, installed and integrated, along with training for field and warehouse teams.
Yes. We integrate with SAP, Oracle, Tally, Microsoft Dynamics and in-house systems for procurement, inventory, quality and export documentation, so warehouse stock and shipment records stay consistent with your finance systems.
Yes. On-premise, private cloud and hybrid deployments are supported. Field applications hold data locally and synchronise to whichever instance you choose, so procurement capture continues during connectivity outages at collection points.
A pilot covering one crop cluster from farmer registration through to a despatched consignment is generally live within ten to fourteen weeks of requirement sign-off. Wider rollout aligns to the crop calendar, since registration precedes the procurement window.
Support runs under an agreed annual maintenance contract covering defined response times, field device servicing, updates when APEDA, EUDR or buyer scheme formats change, and enhancement requests, with additional cover during peak procurement season.